Saturday, January 07, 2006

Bay Area is 50% IO in 2005

Just a quick note: A reader brought to my attention this article in the SF Chronicle. Most of it is the typically bland and not very informative stuff. Until this that is:
Roughly 80 percent of home purchases in the Bay Area were financed using adjustable-rate mortgages...

San Francisco mortgage research firm Loanperformance.com found a whopping 50 percent of buyers in the Bay Area this year used interest-only loans, compared with 45 percent of borrowers statewide and 31 percent nationwide.

3 Comments:

Anonymous rejunkie said...

This article is not clear on what kinds of IO loans they are talking about. I have a fixed interest loan that is IO for the first 5 years and amortizes over the subsequent 25 but the rate is fixed for 30 years. Yes, my payment jumps in year 6 but it is NOT an ARM and I don't think it is particularly risky. This is misleading by painting all IO loans as ARMs.

Jan 7, 2006, 10:14:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, my payment jumps in year 6 but it is NOT an ARM and I don't think it is particularly risky.

Perhaps you're in a better situation than many home(debt)owners, who take the IO/ARM route simply to make the monthly payments? Or, are you doing an ARM to generate "positive cash flow" for the short-term, hoping that appreciation will keep you ahead of red?

Jan 9, 2006, 9:52:00 AM  
Anonymous rejunkie said...

I am not too concerned about negative cash flow but my thinking was that I/O for the first 5 years eased the pain a bit and the jump at year 6 (20% or so) was probably less than the associated increased in rent over that period so at worst, in year 6, I would back to where I am today. I would also expect (or hope) that my salary would be > 20% higher in 5 years' time.

Personally (and I suspect this is heresy on these boards), I think the traditional 30 year amortizing loans are dumb. You will not likely stay in the house for 30 years and the amount you pay the loan down compared to the appreciation over such a time is insignificant. Let's say you bought a Marin home (a Terra Linda eichler to be precise) in 1971 for $41k that is currently worth $850k. Had you bought that with 10% down I/O, today you would have a $35k loan that was costing you $175/month. Who cares? What is the difference between $175(which is 100% deductible, incidentally, because there is no principal pay-down) and 0 in today's dollars?

Although the 1% teaser-rate ARMs that fluctuate wildly after 5 years are great at grabbing headlines and villifying the I/O loan market, there are plenty of safer I/O loans out there.

There are also 10/30 I/Os as well that are I/O for the first 10 years. Sadly, I cannot find a I/O loan that never amortizes.

Jan 9, 2006, 4:33:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Terms of Use: The purpose of the Marin Real Estate Bubble weblog (located at URL http://marinrealestatebubble.blogspot.com/ and henceforth referred to as “MREB” or “this site”) is to present and discuss information relating to real estate and the real estate industry in general (locally, state-wide, nationally, and internationally) as it pertains to the thesis that recent real estate related activity is properly characterized as a “speculative mania” or a “bubble”. MREB is a non-profit, community site that depends on community participation and feedback. While MREB administrators do strive to confirm all information presented here and qualify all doubtful items, the information presented at MREB is neither definitive nor should it be construed as professional advice. All information published on MREB is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind and the administrators of this site shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages arising out of use of this site. This site is moderated by MREB administrators and the MREB administrators reserve the right to edit, remove, or refuse postings that are off-topic, defamatory, libelous, offensive, or otherwise deemed inappropriate by MREB administrators. You should consult a finance professional before making any decisions based on information found on this site.

The contributors to this site may, from time to time, hold short (or long) positions in mentioned and related companies.